SQM Replication Project Update 14-04-06.

Hi Everyone, I am going to go into more detail about my theory from the last update. I have had lots of emails with questions and all of them very good questions to. My explanation may not have been the best. Mr Bearden has, to my satisfaction, solved the source charge problem. In all of science the rule of opposites attract is solid. Even in Marriage the same seems to be true ;O). If we look at magnets, like poles repel and opposites attract. The same is true for the charged particles in the atom and even charge in a battery. If we imagine a battery in the below image of Mr Bearden's source charge diagram, the battery's charge flows from the Positive plate and thus to the Positive Terminal and out through the wire into the circuit and returning to the negative terminal on the battery and thus the Negative plate. Charge separation is a chemical force and in the battery separates the charge back in the same process again. To complete the circuit Electrons flow through the wire to power any loads (Load could be a light bulb) that are attached to the circuit. In this case the Electrons are Positively Charged because they are flowing from the Positive Terminal of the battery.

Source Charge Problem Solved by Mr Bearden:

Now if we imagine the Atom. The Electrons are orbiting the Proton of the Atom, a bit like the Satellites orbit the Earth. The Electrons are Negatively Charged in the Atom and not Positively charged like in the Battery scenario above. At the centre of the Atom there are Protons and Neutrons. Protons are Positively charged, like the Positive Terminal in the battery Scenario above. Neutrons have no charge and thus the term Neutron. In the case where the Negative Electron orbits the Positive Proton and the Neutron the thought popes into the mind "Well the Electron should collapse into the Proton because the Proton is oppositely charged to the Electron (Opposites Attract) and cease to exist because the Proton is supposed to be the Anti Particle of the Electron." In other words the two particles should anile ate due to particles and anti particles colliding. Well they don't and it is not yet explained by Scientists why they don't. I have a pretty good idea why they don't collapse.

The Electron is supposed to be responsible for chemical binding, this means that Atoms bind together and creates Molecules. You would have seen Chemistry molecule structures.

This is a Hydrogen Molecule:

So Molecules are made up from Atoms.

At this point it is very important to ask the question "Where the Atom keeps getting its energy from". It is Perpetual.

The only "Machine" we know of in the Universe that is in Perpetual Motion.

Now if we think about how the binding of an Atom is going to work (Keeping in mind the opposites attract and likes repel rule). So it must be only down to two Processes that account for Binding the Atom. One force must be gravity?, Mass of the protons attract each other. Mass is the same but Protons are much more dense than the Electron. At school we were taught Mass attracts Mass. So this means that the Protons of an Atom can sit in a close vicinity but the Electrons of each Atom must not collide with the Proton of each Atom and the Electrons should repel each other. Gravity in an Atom is supposed to be the weak force though. The attraction of electrons to the opposite Atom's Proton, remember likes repel and opposites attract, could have some affect but the higher orbits of the Electron should prevent this attraction by cancellation of the attraction force because likes (The Electrons) Repel. Now only one possibility is left.

It is the "EM non Observable Flux". It must be fairly obvious now that everything is not playing Our Science game here so we must change our Science game to suit what is really going on. In Prof Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl's book "Scalar Waves - First Tesla Physics Text Book" Nutrino's are the driving force behind everything in the Universe. I believe the Non Observable EM Flux is Nutrino based and this is a Universal force. The Electron is the only particle capable of collecting Nutrino's and transforming into Negative Electron Flows. A little bit like a black hole pulling apart a star and the black hole can spit out streams out the ends in a jet form the Electron creates an organised flow of Nutrino's if the term is ok, "The Electron Feeds on the Nutrino's". This creates a charge flow from the Electron to the Proton exactly like in Mr Bearden's source Charge solution above and an adoption of it in my Diagram below. The Electron is a light weight particle. This continual flow is the force of stability needed for the Atom. The energy ejection acts like a jet engine keeping the passenger jets up in the sky for our safe travel to other countries for holidays etc...

So The Atom is explained, maybe a few minor details need to be covered but the general working of it is explained. The Electron is Collecting or Feeding on Nutrino's and as a result of energy transformation the Electron is ejecting Negative Energy Flows out from themselves. Same as in the Above Diagrams. Normally these Negative Energy Flows are captured by the Positively charged Proton. Protons being positively charged would just dissipate the energy the same as a Battery destroys the dipole in a conventional circuit. See Mr Bearden web site for more information on destroying the Dipole in conventional circuits. Some Information Here.

So you are saying what has this information possibly got to do with the SQM. The SQM takes these Electron flows and uses them directly. We are trying to cancel the interactions of the Proton and collect the Electron Flows by giving the Electrons a path to cancel the Positrons effects of ejecting positive power. Mr Floyd Sweets words were: "A motionally induced E-field is actually created within the space occupied by the moving magnetic flux described above. This field is present therein, whether or not a conductor is present in the space." This is the power house of the SQM or as some like to say the VTA. The Diagram below shows the path of the collection process.

To explain the process: Nutrino's are captured by the Atom's Orbiting Electrons and the Electrons Negative Charge flows are captured by the SQM's collection coil. From the Collection coil Negative power is used in the circuit to power loads and in turn converted to heat or light as part of the normal conversion processes and then the Negative Electrons remaining return to the opposite terminal of the Collection coil. To be able to achieve the Electron Flow Collection A Motional E-Field is needed and the Motional E-Field is between the Moving Magnetic Lines of Flux in the Conditioned magnets.

Lots of information contained in the Dirac Sea documentation I have read is in my belief sketchy. Some makes no sense and sounds almost not true. In my reading of this literature I kept in the back of my mind the fact that Paul Dirac had all the theory and equations before the Proton was even discovered. Another particle was thought to be the factor behind the Negative Energy parts of the equations and not the transformation theory's I have presented here today. The Proton was predicted by Paul Dirac and was formulated as an Anti Particle of the Electron which is true but from what we know the Proton is not producing any Negative Energy at all. We know the Proton is Positively charged so in my opinion it simply can not support Negative Energy.  Paul Dirac saw Positive power and only factored Electrons flowing in a wire in a positive power formation.

Well more coming soon as always.